Tag: Karnataka High Court

TeLawgram Jan, 2021 – Roundup

Post author By Abhishek Rajiv
Post date January 31, 2021
No Comments on TeLawgram Jan, 2021 – Roundup

Hello, this past week has seen several developments ranging from the Supreme Court staying the Bombay High Court judgment which ruled that skin-to-skin contact necessary for offence of ‘sexual assault’ under POCSO to the US Congressional Commission declaring a ‘possible genocide’ against Uighurs in China.
Happy Reading!

Tags Aarogya Setu, Abortion Law, Allahabad High Court, Arbitration, Arbitration Clause, Argentina, Award, Bad Faith, Basic Law, Bombay High Court, Bribe, Cattle slaughter, Central Government, Central Vista, China, Choi Soon-sil, Cognizable, Contract, Counter Proposal, COVID, Covid-19, Delhi High Court, Dual Citizenship, Earnest Money Deposit, Environmental Clearance, Europe, Facebook, Fines, Genocide, Heritage Conservation Committee, Hong Kong, Imprisonment, India, Indian Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996, Indian Contract Act, Interference, IPC, Japan, Japan Nationality Law, Japanese Constitution, Judicial Independence, Karnataka, Karnataka High Court, Latin America, Legalise Abortion, Live-Body Donation, Lutyens Delhi, MEITY, National Security Law, Offence, Offer, Ordinance, Organ Donation, Outraging Modesty, Park Geun-hye, Personal Data Protection Bill, POCSO Act, Presidential Impeachment, Presidential Pardon, Procedure, Public Consultation, Redevelopment Project, RTI, Search, Seoul, Sexual Assault, South Korea, Supreme Court, Tenders, Trade Law, Trump, Uighurs, Vajubhai Vala, Voluntary Interruption of Pregnancy Law, WhatsApp, WhatsApp Privacy Policy, Writs, WTO

TeLawgram

20.11.20 – 27.11.20

Hello, this past week has seen several developments ranging from the Madras High Court passing an interim order against sexual advertisements to the EU Court of Justice finding fleeing military draft as a ground for granting asylum. Happy Reading!

Tags Advertisements, Amazon, Amnesty International, Arbitration, Article 24, Asylum, Cable TV Regulation Act, Censorship, Children, Cinematographic Act, Competition Law, debt schemes, Delhi High Court, Emergency Arbitrator, EU, European Court of Justice, European Union, exemption, Franklin Templeton, Free Speech, Freshfields, Future Group, GDPR, General Clauses Act, Germany, Global Security Act, Google, Hannover, Income Tax Act, investment, Journalism, Karnataka High Court, Kerala Police (Amendment) Ordinance, Kerala Police (Amendment) Withdrawal Ordinance, Kerala Police Act, Madras High Court, Marijuana, Marijuana Legalisation, Military Drafting, mutual funds, No-deal Brexit, Opioid, Opioid Crisis, OxyContin, Press Freedom, Prevention of Corruption (Amendment) Act, Purdue Pharma, Reliance, Restructuring, Retrospective, Right to be forgotten, Right to Privacy, royalty, search engine, search results, Section 40(a)(iib), service, Singapore Arbitration Centre, Supreme Court, Sweden, Syria, tax, UK LLP, VAT, Women

TeLawgram

13.11.20 – 19.11.20

Hello, this past week has seen several developments ranging from the Tamil Nadu Government considering regulating online gambling to the Asia Pacific states entering into a Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership. Happy Reading!

Tags Article 21, Article 21A, Asia-Pacific States, Australia, BBMp, Beggary, Bill 13, Bill of Rights, Cable Television Act, Canada, Child Rights, China, Code of Civil Prodecue, Companies Act, Criminal Prosecution, Delhi High Court, Digital Charter, Duma, Europe, European Union, Ex Parte Injunctions, Executive Commission, Free Trade Deal, Guidelines, H-1B Visa, Hong Kong, Hong Kong City Government, Immigration, Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, Interim Relief, IPCC, Japan, Karnataka High Court, LGBT Equality, LGBT Rights, LGBTQI+, Madras High Court, Media, Navdeep Bains, Online Gambling, Police Brutality, Presedential Immunity, Privacy, Putin, Ramil Nadu, RCEP, Regulation, Regulations on online gaming, Russia, Scheme, Section 9, South Korea, State Immunity, Supreme Court, Tablighi Jamaat, Travel Ban, Trump, US, Winding up proceedings

TeLawgram

24.10.20 – 30.10.20

Hello! This past week has seen several developments ranging from the Supreme Court ruling that officers involved in NDPS cases cannot give admissible confessional statements to the Treaty on Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons being ratified to enter into force. Happy reading!