Tag: Indian Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996

TeLawgram Jan, 2021 – Roundup

Post author By Abhishek Rajiv
Post date January 31, 2021
3 Comments on TeLawgram Jan, 2021 – Roundup

Hello, this past week has seen several developments ranging from the Supreme Court staying the Bombay High Court judgment which ruled that skin-to-skin contact necessary for offence of ‘sexual assault’ under POCSO to the US Congressional Commission declaring a ‘possible genocide’ against Uighurs in China.
Happy Reading!

Tags Aarogya Setu, Abortion Law, Allahabad High Court, Arbitration, Arbitration Clause, Argentina, Award, Bad Faith, Basic Law, Bombay High Court, Bribe, Cattle slaughter, Central Government, Central Vista, China, Choi Soon-sil, Cognizable, Contract, Counter Proposal, COVID, Covid-19, Delhi High Court, Dual Citizenship, Earnest Money Deposit, Environmental Clearance, Europe, Facebook, Fines, Genocide, Heritage Conservation Committee, Hong Kong, Imprisonment, India, Indian Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996, Indian Contract Act, Interference, IPC, Japan, Japan Nationality Law, Japanese Constitution, Judicial Independence, Karnataka, Karnataka High Court, Latin America, Legalise Abortion, Live-Body Donation, Lutyens Delhi, MEITY, National Security Law, Offence, Offer, Ordinance, Organ Donation, Outraging Modesty, Park Geun-hye, Personal Data Protection Bill, POCSO Act, Presidential Impeachment, Presidential Pardon, Procedure, Public Consultation, Redevelopment Project, RTI, Search, Seoul, Sexual Assault, South Korea, Supreme Court, Tenders, Trade Law, Trump, Uighurs, Vajubhai Vala, Voluntary Interruption of Pregnancy Law, WhatsApp, WhatsApp Privacy Policy, Writs, WTO

TeLawgram

06.11.20 – 13.11.20

Hello, this past week has seen several developments ranging from the Supreme Court halting the enforcement of the Antrix Arbitral Award to the President of Kosovo being indicted on war crimes. Happy Reading!

Tags Abetment to Suicide, Anto-discrimination, Antrix, Antrix Corp., Arnab Goswami, Bail, Code of Criminal Procedure, Consent, CrPC, Death Penalty, Devas Multimedia, Dual Use Goods, EDPB, EU-US Privacy Shield, European Parliament, European Union, Extradition, False Complaint, Force Majeure, Habeas Corpus, Hate Crime, Honour KillingsMurder, Human Rights, Hungary, Indian Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996, International Chamber of Commerce, Investor-State Arbitration, Italy, Judicial Restraint, Kim Dotcom, Kosovo, Kosovo Liberation Army, LGBTQ Rights, LGBTQI+, Megaupload, Mitigating Factors, New Zealand, Personal Data, POCSO, President Hashim Thaci, Presumption of Innocence, Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Reparation for Women, Reverse Burden of Proof, Same-sex couples adoption, Sheikh Khalifa bin Zayed Al Nahyan, Supreme Court, Surveillance Technologies, UAE, USA, Violence, War Crimes, Women, Yugoslavia

Arbitration

Independence of Party Appointed Expert: The Unsettled Law in International Arbitration

Post author By nualslj
Post date August 24, 2020
No Comments on Independence of Party Appointed Expert: The Unsettled Law in International Arbitration

Harshal Sareen Introduction The issue of independence of party-appointed experts is at the forefront of debate and discussion amongst arbitration enthusiasts and policy drafters. The question of whether or not there is a need for independence in relation to a party-appointed expert is still unclear. However, the opinion seems to be divided regarding the requirement […]

Tags Arbitration, IBA, IBA Rules, Indian Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996, International Arbitration, Party Appointed Expert