Tag: Right to Privacy

You’ve Got TeLawgram: 2020 Roundup

Post author By Abhishek Rajiv
Post date January 1, 2021
No Comments on You’ve Got TeLawgram: 2020 Roundup

2020 was a tough year for all of us. Regardless, the world has marched on. Countless changes have been wrought worldwide, in all spheres, including law. In furtherance of our goal of providing our readers with updates, we have collected the largest updates over the past year, in India, and have presented them with a curated reading list for your perusal.
Happy Reading!

Tags Aarogya Setu, Academia, Affirmative Action, Allahabad High Court, Amendment, Andhra Pradesh, Article 14, Article 21, Article 33, Ayodhya, Ayodhya verdict, Babri Masjid, Babri Masjid Demolition, Bombay High Court, Burden of Proof, CBI, CBI Special Court, Central Bureau of Investigation, Child Sex Abuse, Children, Classification, Code of Criminal Procedure, Constitution, Constitution of India, Contempt of COurt, Copyright, Copyright Infringement, Coronavirus, COVID, Covid-19, Criminal Law, Criteria, Custody, Dalvir Singh, Definition, Delayed Justice, Delhi High Court, Democracy, Divorce, Domestic Violence, Dr. Subhash Kashinath Mahajan v. The State of Maharashtra & Anr., Dying Declaration, E-Courts, E.V. Chinnaiah, Equality, Evidence, Evidence Law, Fake News, Father Thomas Kottoor, Female Army Officers, Forensic Science, Freedom of Expression, Freedom of Speech, Hathras, Hathras Case, High Court, Hindu Endowments, Hindu Marriage Act, Humanitarian Crisis, Intellectual Property Law, Intellectual Property Rights, Investigation, Justice Arun Mishra, Justice B.R. Gavai, Justice Krishna Murari, Kashmir Lockdown, Kerala High COurt, Lapse in Criminal Procedure, Libgen, Lockdown, Madhya Pradesh, Marriage, Media Houses, Media Trials, Migrant Workers, MSME, MSME Act, Murder trial, NALSA v. Union of India, Open Access Movement, Overcrowding, Padmanabhaswamy Temple, Pandemic, Parents, Parole, Permanent Commission, POCSO, Police, Prashant Bhushan, Preferential treatment, Presumption of Innocence, Prima Facie instances of violence, Prisoners, Prithvi Raj Chauhan v. Union of India & Ors., Publishers, Punjab, Puttuswamy, Ram Janma Bhoomi, Rape, Regulation, Release, Right of Administration, Right to Health, Right to Internet, Right to Privacy, Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Amendment Act, Schedules Caste, Science, SciHub, Section 144, Section 18A, Sentencing, Shebaitship, Shyamlal Devda & Ors. v. Parimala, Sister Abhaya, Sister Abhaya murder, Sister Sephy, Speedy Trial, Sub-classification, Supreme Court, Tablighi Jamaat, The Secretary Ministry of Defence v. Babita Puniya, Transgender Identity, Transgender Persons Act, Travencore Royal Family, Tweets, Twitter, Under Trial Period

TeLawgram

20.11.20 – 27.11.20

Hello, this past week has seen several developments ranging from the Madras High Court passing an interim order against sexual advertisements to the EU Court of Justice finding fleeing military draft as a ground for granting asylum. Happy Reading!

Tags Advertisements, Amazon, Amnesty International, Arbitration, Article 24, Asylum, Cable TV Regulation Act, Censorship, Children, Cinematographic Act, Competition Law, debt schemes, Delhi High Court, Emergency Arbitrator, EU, European Court of Justice, European Union, exemption, Franklin Templeton, Free Speech, Freshfields, Future Group, GDPR, General Clauses Act, Germany, Global Security Act, Google, Hannover, Income Tax Act, investment, Journalism, Karnataka High Court, Kerala Police (Amendment) Ordinance, Kerala Police (Amendment) Withdrawal Ordinance, Kerala Police Act, Madras High Court, Marijuana, Marijuana Legalisation, Military Drafting, mutual funds, No-deal Brexit, Opioid, Opioid Crisis, OxyContin, Press Freedom, Prevention of Corruption (Amendment) Act, Purdue Pharma, Reliance, Restructuring, Retrospective, Right to be forgotten, Right to Privacy, royalty, search engine, search results, Section 40(a)(iib), service, Singapore Arbitration Centre, Supreme Court, Sweden, Syria, tax, UK LLP, VAT, Women

TeLawgram

25.09.20 – 02.10.20

Greetings! We are pleased to present ‘TeLawgram’, our new weekly segment focussing on events of legal importance – in India and elsewhere. For your ease, we will be providing a brief summary of events, as well as a reading list that explores different points of view. With TeLawgram, we hope to both inform readers and […]

Tags Babri Masjid, Brexit, Call for Papers, Copyright, Criminal Law, Data Protection, EU, European Union, Facebook, Free Speech, GDPR, Gujarat, Hathras Case, Labour Rights, LGPD, Privacy, Right to Privacy, Social Media, Twitter

Constitutional Law Rights Adjudication

Analyzing the Concept of BYOD: An Insight into the Employee’s Perspective on Right to Privacy

Post author By nualslj
Post date November 9, 2019
No Comments on Analyzing the Concept of BYOD: An Insight into the Employee’s Perspective on Right to Privacy

By Deepti Pandey & Sushant Shekhar Singh After the dust settled on K S Puttaswamy v. Union of India by recognizing the fundamental right to privacy in India, various facets of privacy have gained prominence.[1] One such aspect is the privacy right in corporations under the relationship of employment. Increased surveillance in employment is a […]

Tags BYOD, Employee, Employer, Employment, K S Puttaswamy, Right to Privacy