Tag: Genocide

’22 Week 5(01/04 – 07/04)

Post author By aneetam
Post date April 10, 2022
No Comments on ’22 Week 5(01/04 – 07/04)

Hello everyone! The past week has seen several developments in various realms of law! We travel from Delhi to Oklahoma to examine John Doe orders, competition law investigations abortion laws, international criminal trials and much more! Happy reading!

TeLawgram

’21 – Week 6 (04/02- 11/02)

Post author By Poorvi Yerrapureddy
Post date February 14, 2021
No Comments on ’21 – Week 6 (04/02- 11/02)

Greetings! This week our updates look at decisions ranging from the Madras HC’s ruling on HRC recommendations to the ICC’s ruling on jurisdiction over crimes committed in Palestine. Happy Reading!

Tags Article 370, Bankruptcy, binding, China, Coast Guard Law, contextual interpretation, corporate insolvency resolution proceedings, Crimes against Humanity, Criminal Defences, discretion, Divorce, Duress, East China Sea, ECS, Family Law, Freedom of Navigation, Genocide, Human Rights, IBC Ordinance, ICC, Individual Criminal Responsibility, Insolvency, International Environmental Law, IPC, Jammu and Kashmir, Japan, Jurisdiction, Justice D Y Chandrachud, Justice M R Shah, Kerala High COurt, Madras High Court, Murder, Mutual Consent, object and purpose, operational debts, Premeditation, Protection of Human Rights Act, Rajya Sabha, recommendations, Reorganisation Act, retrospective application, Rome Statute, Stressed assets, Sudden Provocation, Supreme Court, Uganda, Uighur, UNCLOS, United Kingdom, United Nations General Assembly, United States, Use of Force at Sea, War Crimes, Xinjiang

TeLawgram

TeLawgram Jan, 2021 – Roundup

Post author By Abhishek Rajiv
Post date January 31, 2021
3 Comments on TeLawgram Jan, 2021 – Roundup

Hello, this past week has seen several developments ranging from the Supreme Court staying the Bombay High Court judgment which ruled that skin-to-skin contact necessary for offence of ‘sexual assault’ under POCSO to the US Congressional Commission declaring a ‘possible genocide’ against Uighurs in China.
Happy Reading!

Tags Aarogya Setu, Abortion Law, Allahabad High Court, Arbitration, Arbitration Clause, Argentina, Award, Bad Faith, Basic Law, Bombay High Court, Bribe, Cattle slaughter, Central Government, Central Vista, China, Choi Soon-sil, Cognizable, Contract, Counter Proposal, COVID, Covid-19, Delhi High Court, Dual Citizenship, Earnest Money Deposit, Environmental Clearance, Europe, Facebook, Fines, Genocide, Heritage Conservation Committee, Hong Kong, Imprisonment, India, Indian Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996, Indian Contract Act, Interference, IPC, Japan, Japan Nationality Law, Japanese Constitution, Judicial Independence, Karnataka, Karnataka High Court, Latin America, Legalise Abortion, Live-Body Donation, Lutyens Delhi, MEITY, National Security Law, Offence, Offer, Ordinance, Organ Donation, Outraging Modesty, Park Geun-hye, Personal Data Protection Bill, POCSO Act, Presidential Impeachment, Presidential Pardon, Procedure, Public Consultation, Redevelopment Project, RTI, Search, Seoul, Sexual Assault, South Korea, Supreme Court, Tenders, Trade Law, Trump, Uighurs, Vajubhai Vala, Voluntary Interruption of Pregnancy Law, WhatsApp, WhatsApp Privacy Policy, Writs, WTO