Tag: Contempt of COurt

You’ve Got TeLawgram: 2020 Roundup

Post author By Abhishek Rajiv
Post date January 1, 2021
No Comments on You’ve Got TeLawgram: 2020 Roundup

2020 was a tough year for all of us. Regardless, the world has marched on. Countless changes have been wrought worldwide, in all spheres, including law. In furtherance of our goal of providing our readers with updates, we have collected the largest updates over the past year, in India, and have presented them with a curated reading list for your perusal.
Happy Reading!

Tags Aarogya Setu, Academia, Affirmative Action, Allahabad High Court, Amendment, Andhra Pradesh, Article 14, Article 21, Article 33, Ayodhya, Ayodhya verdict, Babri Masjid, Babri Masjid Demolition, Bombay High Court, Burden of Proof, CBI, CBI Special Court, Central Bureau of Investigation, Child Sex Abuse, Children, Classification, Code of Criminal Procedure, Constitution, Constitution of India, Contempt of COurt, Copyright, Copyright Infringement, Coronavirus, COVID, Covid-19, Criminal Law, Criteria, Custody, Dalvir Singh, Definition, Delayed Justice, Delhi High Court, Democracy, Divorce, Domestic Violence, Dr. Subhash Kashinath Mahajan v. The State of Maharashtra & Anr., Dying Declaration, E-Courts, E.V. Chinnaiah, Equality, Evidence, Evidence Law, Fake News, Father Thomas Kottoor, Female Army Officers, Forensic Science, Freedom of Expression, Freedom of Speech, Hathras, Hathras Case, High Court, Hindu Endowments, Hindu Marriage Act, Humanitarian Crisis, Intellectual Property Law, Intellectual Property Rights, Investigation, Justice Arun Mishra, Justice B.R. Gavai, Justice Krishna Murari, Kashmir Lockdown, Kerala High COurt, Lapse in Criminal Procedure, Libgen, Lockdown, Madhya Pradesh, Marriage, Media Houses, Media Trials, Migrant Workers, MSME, MSME Act, Murder trial, NALSA v. Union of India, Open Access Movement, Overcrowding, Padmanabhaswamy Temple, Pandemic, Parents, Parole, Permanent Commission, POCSO, Police, Prashant Bhushan, Preferential treatment, Presumption of Innocence, Prima Facie instances of violence, Prisoners, Prithvi Raj Chauhan v. Union of India & Ors., Publishers, Punjab, Puttuswamy, Ram Janma Bhoomi, Rape, Regulation, Release, Right of Administration, Right to Health, Right to Internet, Right to Privacy, Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Amendment Act, Schedules Caste, Science, SciHub, Section 144, Section 18A, Sentencing, Shebaitship, Shyamlal Devda & Ors. v. Parimala, Sister Abhaya, Sister Abhaya murder, Sister Sephy, Speedy Trial, Sub-classification, Supreme Court, Tablighi Jamaat, The Secretary Ministry of Defence v. Babita Puniya, Transgender Identity, Transgender Persons Act, Travencore Royal Family, Tweets, Twitter, Under Trial Period

Constitutional Law

Who Blemished the Virtue of the Court? Bhushan or the Court Itself?

Post author By Abhishek Rajiv
Post date September 16, 2020
No Comments on Who Blemished the Virtue of the Court? Bhushan or the Court Itself?

By Swaraj Abhiyan

Amartya Sahastranshu Singh & Manish Kumar “Freedom is what freedom does and Justice fails when Judges quail” Justice V.R Krishna Iyer Prashant Bhushan’s two tweets on 27th June 2020 and 22nd July 2020 respectively, have shaken up the apex judicial institution of India. He posted tweets censuring the last four CJIs for playing a leading […]

Tags Bhushan, Contempt, Contempt of COurt, Prashant Bhushan, Supreme Court