Tag: NCLT

When Recall Becomes a Door to Delay: Procedural Abuse and Finality in Insolvency Adjudication: Part 2

Post author By nualslj
Post date March 15, 2026
No Comments on When Recall Becomes a Door to Delay: Procedural Abuse and Finality in Insolvency Adjudication: Part 2

Shivangi Nawalkha & Shreshtha Saha Ray In Part I, we examined how recall jurisdiction, though conceived as a narrow corrective safeguard, has increasingly been deployed as a strategic instrument of delay in insolvency proceedings. Part II builds on that diagnosis by examining the jurisprudential boundaries of recall and articulating a principled reform framework. Case Studies […]

Tags business, corporate insolvency resolution process, finance, IBC 2016, Insolvency, law, NCLAT, NCLT, Procedural Abuse in Insolvency, Recall Jurisdiction, Resolution Plan Finality

Insolvency

When Recall Becomes a Door to Delay: Procedural Abuse and Finality in Insolvency Adjudication: Part 1

Post author By nualslj
Post date March 15, 2026
No Comments on When Recall Becomes a Door to Delay: Procedural Abuse and Finality in Insolvency Adjudication: Part 1

Shivangi Nawalkha & Shreshtha Saha Ray Introduction The power of the National Company Law Tribunal’s (“NCLT”) and National Company Law Appellate Tribunal’s (“NCLAT”) power to recall their own orders is a blunt yet indispensable judicial instrument. It operates as a corrective safeguard to prevent the miscarriage of justice, to nullify orders procured by fraud or […]

Tags business, corporate insolvency resolution process, finance, IBC 2016, Insolvency, Insolvency Litigation Strategy, law, NCLAT, NCLT, news, Procedural Abuse, Recall Jurisdiction, Resolution Plan Implementation

TeLawgram

’22 Week 2 (17/02 – 24/02)

Post author By aneetam
Post date February 27, 2022
No Comments on ’22 Week 2 (17/02 – 24/02)

Hello! This week’s updates include developments in corporate, criminal, constitutional and human rights law among others. We look at decisions and laws to protect the LGBTQ+ community in India and New Zealand, the Tata-Mistry dispute and Russia’s “special military operation” in Ukraine, and much more! Happy Reading!

Tags abortion, Ahmedabad serial blasts, Ahmedabad special court, Colombia, Colombian Constitutional Court, Conversion therapy, convicts, corporate, criminal conspiracy, Cyrus Mistry, Death Penalty, domicile-based reservation, Donbas, Donetsk, employers, Haryana, Haryana State Employment of Local Candidates Act, High Court, Indian Penal Code, International Law, Latin America, Lauterpacht, LGBTQ+ glossary, life imprisonment, local, Luhansk, Madras HC, mismanagement, Murder, National Medical Council, NCLAT, NCLT, oppression, patent illegality, Putin, rarest of rare, Recognition, reservation, Russia, Section 120B, Section 302, Self Defence, Shapoorji Pallonji, SP group, state law, Supreme Court, Tata, Tata Sons, Tata v. Mistry, Transgender policy, Ukraine, UN Charter, unconstitutionality, Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act

Arbitration

Arbitrability of Insolvency Disputes: A Case Study of the Kotak Group vs Indus Biotech Case

Post author By nualslj
Post date September 5, 2020
3 Comments on Arbitrability of Insolvency Disputes: A Case Study of the Kotak Group vs Indus Biotech Case

Vishesh Jain & Dhruv Sirpurkar In June 2020, the Mumbai Bench of the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) pronounced its decision in the Kotak India Venture Fund vs Indus Biotech Pvt. Ltd. Case, dismissing the Section 7 IBC petition filed by Kotak. The court opined that the arbitration clause of the agreement was wide enough […]

Tags ACA, Arbitration, NCLT