Tag: Discretionary Powers

To Consolidate Or Not To Consolidate: Uncertainty Regarding Power of Consolidation Under ICC Rules Article 10

Post author By shivanijvn
Post date August 5, 2024
No Comments on To Consolidate Or Not To Consolidate: Uncertainty Regarding Power of Consolidation Under ICC Rules Article 10

Ahan Gadkari Introduction Article 10 of the 2021 International Chamber of Commerce (“ICC”) Rules grants the ICC Court the discretionary power to consolidate two or more arbitrations. This creates a compelling dilemma: when parties deliberately select the ICC Rules within their arbitration agreement and further stipulate a clause that empowers the arbitration tribunal to consolidate […]

Tags AEC v. TDIC, Article 10 ICC Rules, Consolidation, Consolidation of Arbitration, De Jure Belli ac Pacis, Discretionary Powers, Discretionary Powers of the Tribunal, Georgetown University, Hyflux and MCB, International Chamber of Commerce, PDV v. ConocoPhillips Company and Sweeny Coker, Tion Huat Rubber Factory v. Wah-Chang, UNCITRAL Model Law

TeLawgram

’21 Week 15 (11/04 – 16/04)

Post author By Abhishek Rajiv
Post date April 18, 2021
No Comments on ’21 Week 15 (11/04 – 16/04)

Greetings! This week, Telawgram brings to you discussions ranging from the Limitation Act to the NCLAT on the national front and updates from Hong Kong’s voting laws to indigenous land rights in Brazil on the international front and much more. Happy Reading!

Tags Adoption, Alibaba, Ant Group, Anti-monopoly, Antitrust Law, Arbitration, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, Australia, Australian public servants, Bail, Biodiversity Act, Brazil, Carrie Lam, China, Companies Act, Debt, Discretionary Powers, Electoral Bill, European Convention on Human Rights, European Court of Human Rights, Extortion, Freedom of Speech, Funding Terrorism, gender discrimination, Guarani Kaiowá, Guyraroká territory, Hong Kong, Indigenous people, Indigenous people rights, Injunctions, Judges, Justice BR Gavai, Justice Hrishikesh Roy, Justice Rohinton Nariman, Juvenile Justice Act, Karnataka High Court, Kerala High COurt, Limitation Act, Live-in relationships, Mato Grosso do Sul, National Green Tribunal, NCLAT, Per Incuriam, Politician, public interest, SAMR, Section 18 of Limitation Act, Section 41, sexual harrasment, Specific Relief Act, Supreme Federal Court, Tags Supreme Court, Turkey, Turkish Coup, UAPA